These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644094)
41. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Incompetent patient in PVS: views of relatives and "best interests": Re G. Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 11656729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. In re Quinlan: one step further. Ek GK Houst Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 24(2):383-98. PubMed ID: 11649893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers. Greenfield RE St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma. Peterson GW Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Comatose woman's family presses food-tube removal. Sullivan R N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment. Bolsen B Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life? Cerminara KL Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Grace Plaza of Great Neck v. Elbaum. New York. Court of Appeals North East Rep Second Ser; 1993 Oct; 623():513-8. PubMed ID: 12041259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live". Kamisar Y Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state. Morgan R; Harty-Golder B Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. United States--life support: one firm decision. Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8421):157. PubMed ID: 11644477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Right to die takes a twist. Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):7. PubMed ID: 11645546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]