These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644099)
1. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life. Wakefield-Fisher M Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Smith SR Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma? Shapiro RS; Barthel R Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns. Fost N Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives. Ciulla JB Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey. Sarno JJ Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts. Rhoden NK South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legacy of Infant Doe. Cosby MG Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis? Smith GP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule. Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions. Nicholson EB; Horowitz RM; Parry J; ; Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights. Cooper R Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care. Gorski SL Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it? Clark FI Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]