These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644115)

  • 1. Ethical implications of clinical judgment (the role of the hospital bioethics committee).
    Sherman SR
    Conn Med; 1984 Feb; 48(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 11644115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethics committee guidelines issued.
    Krieger L
    Am Med News; 1984 May; 27(18):1, 34. PubMed ID: 11646386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deciding whether the baby lives.
    Curran M
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():Health Su-17. PubMed ID: 11646285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Institutional ethics committee's roles, responsibilities, and benefits for physicians.
    Minnesota Medical Association. Committee on Ethics and Medical-Legal Affairs
    Minn Med; 1985 Aug; 68(8):605, 607-612. PubMed ID: 11643801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment": a critique.
    Williams JR
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1984 Nov; 17(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 11651758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal perspectives on institutional ethics committees.
    Capron AM
    J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):417-31. PubMed ID: 11651865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neonatal euthanasia: Jewish views of a contemporary dilemma.
    Jakobovits Y
    Tradition; 1986; 22(3):13-30. PubMed ID: 11651882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infant Bioethics Committees: dispute over guidelines.
    Murray TH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Jun; 14(3):3-4. PubMed ID: 11644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment.
    Bolsen B
    Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bedside story.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(1):85-6. PubMed ID: 11643075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill child.
    Waldman AM
    J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):890-2. PubMed ID: 11662999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. If not that way, what way?
    America (NY); 1986 Jul; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Panel specifies who should decide to 'pull the plug.
    Med World News; 1982 Nov; 23(24):6-9. PubMed ID: 11645475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS; Barthel R
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suit emphasizes drawbacks of 'Baby Doe' rules.
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):4. PubMed ID: 11646355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ethics committee at work.
    Rubinow MB
    Conn Med; 1984 Nov; 48(11):759. PubMed ID: 11644172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.