These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644116)
1. Science and society--are scientific-ethical committees bridging a gap? Riis P Acta Med Scand; 1984; 215(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 11644116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Government regulation of scientific research. Robertson JA Jurimetrics; 1979; 19(4):301-38. PubMed ID: 11651670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Man-child in a promised land: a layman serves on the human subjects committee. Roseman KD IRB; 1987; 9(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ways forward for research ethics review. Nicholson R Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Dec; No. 94():13-6. PubMed ID: 11652344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How unaffiliated/nonscientist members of institutional review boards see their roles. Porter JP IRB; 1987; 9(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical review of multi-centre research. Horwitz R Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Oct; No. 102():13-5. PubMed ID: 11654130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What is the role of a public member on an IRB? Ghio JM IRB; 1980 Feb; 2(2):7. PubMed ID: 11661800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A national research ethics committee? Alderson P Bull Med Ethics; 1995 Apr; No. 107():13-6. PubMed ID: 11654315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Denmark takes a lead on research ethics. Goldbeck-Wood S BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7139):1189. PubMed ID: 11645050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research ethics review in Australia, Europe and North America. McNeill PM IRB; 1989; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research ethical committees. Rowland M; Greenwood BM Lancet; 1983 Jul; 2(8344):288. PubMed ID: 11644264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Current problems and trends in testing of human drugs--especially in regard to institutional review committees. Burrell CD Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1975 Apr; 30(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11663255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. International trends in ethical review of medical research. Miller E IRB; 1981 Oct; 3(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11650529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics review in Canada: highlights from a national workshop, part 1. Miller JN Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1989 Nov; 22(7):515-23. PubMed ID: 11654894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Multidisciplinary review for the protection of human subjects in biomedical research: present and prospective HEW policy. Mishkin B Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):278-87. PubMed ID: 11661086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Lively debate on research ethics in the US: meeting report. Nicholson RH Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Nov; No. 143():3-7. PubMed ID: 11657620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The incommensurability of research risks and benefits: practical help for research ethics committees. Martin DK; Meslin EM; Kohut N; Singer PA IRB; 1995; 17(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 11653055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A noninstitutional review board comes of age. Herman SS IRB; 1989; 11(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioethics consultants to the National Institutes of Health's intramural IRB system: the continuing evolution. DeRenzo EG; Bonkovsky FO IRB; 1993; 15(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11652155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The ethics of research ethics committees. Nicholl J BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1217. PubMed ID: 10784570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]