These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644128)

  • 1. Abortion 1984: the controversy continues.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1984 Apr; 48(4):269. PubMed ID: 11644128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The viability of the trimester approach.
    Calder KA
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
    Rhoden NK
    Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.: stare decisis prevails, but for how long?
    Prieto P
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 38(5):921-38. PubMed ID: 11655794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right of privacy--mandatory hospitalization for all second trimester abortions invalidated as not being reasonably related to maternal health--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 103 S.Ct. 2481 (1983).
    Lim DG
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1984; 24(3):789-801. PubMed ID: 11655804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Satris MJ
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
    Chemerinsky E
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constitutional law--abortion--a requirement that "all" second trimester abortions shall be performed in a hospital is unconstitutional--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 51 U.S.L.W. 4767 (June 15, 1983).
    Colbert J
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1983 Fall-1984 Spring; 9(1-2):144-65. PubMed ID: 11655796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--right to privacy--municipal roadblock to abortion denounced--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2481(1983).
    Crusius CJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1984; 14(3):658-82. PubMed ID: 11658811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
    Rubenfeld J
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
    Rush SE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion: are medicine and the law on a collision course?
    Pollner F
    Med World News; 1985 Jul; 26(13):66-68, 70, 73+. PubMed ID: 11645557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
    Tribe LH
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
    Casurella JG; Schrock CT
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
    Blaustein AP
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium.
    Chopko ME
    Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.