BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644157)

  • 1. Who should make medical decisions?
    Genel M
    Conn Med; 1984 Aug; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. If not that way, what way?
    America (NY); 1986 Jul; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgery and the rights of children with handicaps.
    Kugel RB
    N Y Med Q; 1985; 5(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11650764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
    Capron AM
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns.
    Lawton SE; Carder EB; Weisman AW
    J Coll Univ Law; 1985; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protecting handicapped infants.
    Washington Post; 1984 Dec; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suit emphasizes drawbacks of 'Baby Doe' rules.
    Am Med News; 1984 Mar 23-30; 27(12):4. PubMed ID: 11646355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Panel specifies who should decide to 'pull the plug.
    Med World News; 1982 Nov; 23(24):6-9. PubMed ID: 11645475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
    Sarno JJ
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
    Curran M
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
    Born MA
    KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Baby Jane Doe.
    America (NY); 1983 Nov; 149(16):302-3. PubMed ID: 11658405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
    Fost N
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
    Marzen TJ; Uddo BJ
    America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions.
    Nicholson EB; Horowitz RM; Parry J; ;
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.