These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644161)
1. What do we owe to Baby Jane? Burke RL; Monaco GP; Kaufman R; Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):49-50. PubMed ID: 11644161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Baby Jane Doe. America (NY); 1983 Nov; 149(16):302-3. PubMed ID: 11658405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond. Phillips CA Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe. Minow M Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues. Conley JJ America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What ever happened to Baby Jane...Doe? Jolly CM West State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 14(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11651891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Preserving the life of children. Louisiana Revis Statut La; 1982; Title 40 Sections 1299.36.1 to 1299.36.3():. PubMed ID: 12041499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases. Bopp J; Coleson RE Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey. Sarno JJ Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1985 developments. National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):257-78. PubMed ID: 11651813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ultimate parental nightmare: should our 'bad baby' live or die? Lyon J Washington Post; 1985 Feb; ():C1, C2. PubMed ID: 11646289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe. Drinan RF America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Last rights: an analysis of refusal and withholding of treatment cases. Brant J Miss Law Rev; 1981; 46(2):337-70. PubMed ID: 11651657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baby Jane. Cohen R Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():B1. PubMed ID: 11646270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bowen v. American Hospital Association: federal regulation is powerless to save Baby Doe. Cantrell DF Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):1199-218. PubMed ID: 11650766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treating defective newborns: the ethical dilemma. Brant J; McNulty A Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):34-36,45-47. PubMed ID: 11651708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding. Born MA KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]