250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644166)
1. Biological monitoring: the employer's dilemma.
Miller FH
Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):388-426. PubMed ID: 11644166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
Andrade VM
Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
Buss E
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic testing in the workplace.
Rowinski L
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():375-413. PubMed ID: 11645613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Making healthy babies.
Henifin MS; Bertin J
Sci People; 1984; 16(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11649543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal exposure to fetally toxic work environments: the dilemma of the 1978 Pregnancy Amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Furnish HA
Iowa Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 66(1):63-129. PubMed ID: 11661992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal protection programs under Title VII--rebutting the procreation assumption.
Blanco AC
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1985; 46(3):755-94. PubMed ID: 11649206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AIDS in the workplace: public and corporate policy.
Heacock MV; Orvis GP
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(2):689-713. PubMed ID: 11656268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols.
Gorenberg H; White A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Occupational health risks and the worker's right to know.
Yale Law J; 1981 Jul; 90(8):1792-810. PubMed ID: 11658346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. OSHRC rules sterilization is not an occupational hazard.
Jameson R
Trial; 1981 Jul; 17(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11653563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal protection and freedom of contract.
Paul EF
Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 11652079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. OSHA regulation of industrial applications of recombinant DNA technology.
Korwek EL
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1981; 50(2):284-313. PubMed ID: 11649489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal and regulatory perspectives in mass immunization programs.
Ladimer I
Insur Law J; 1976 Aug; (643):. PubMed ID: 11664613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Compensation for and prevention of occupational disease.
American Public Health Association
Am J Public Health; 1984 Mar; 74(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 11644114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New row over workplace sterilisation.
New Sci; 1980 Sep; 87(1220):908. PubMed ID: 11664086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal protection policies in the workplace: continuing controversy in light of Johnson Controls.
Blank R
Politics Life Sci; 1992 Aug; 11(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 11659520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Corporate corruption of medical literature: asbestos studies concealed by W.R. Grace & Co.
Egilman D; Wallace W; Hom C
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):127-47. PubMed ID: 11660587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The developing law on AIDS in the workplace.
Carey JH; Arthur MM
MD Law Rev; 1987; 46(2):284-319. PubMed ID: 11651889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Firing the woman to protect the fetus: the reconciliation of fetal protection with employment opportunity goals under Title VII.
Williams WW
Georgetown Law J; 1981 Feb; 69(3):641-704. PubMed ID: 11649426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
