288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644167)
1. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
Pollard CT
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
Eisenberg KG
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
Williams SE
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis.
Krasik EB
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Right to decline life-prolonging procedures.
Florida
Wests Fla Statut Annot Fla; 1985; Sections 765.01 to 765.15(Suppl. Pamphlet):. PubMed ID: 12043654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making?
Webster WL
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
Oxman ML
J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life?
Cerminara KL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
Bates KW
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
