288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644167)
21. In re Bayer.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case.
Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ
Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Right to die upheld for comatose patients.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 11652365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider.
Thompson WH
Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
Kenney SC
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. In re Zahn.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):485. PubMed ID: 11644072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. In re Storar: euthanasia for incompetent patients, a proposed model.
Haber JG
Pace Law Rev; 1983; 3(2):351-74. PubMed ID: 11658505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney.
Hamann AA
Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In re Drabick.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz.
Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The life support cases: myths and realities.
Hartz JN
Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):18-20, 33, 52+. PubMed ID: 11653530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Foregoing nutrition and hydration.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Helping the hopelessly ill.
Landsman RM
Trusts Estates; 1988 Apr; 127(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11652539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Newman v. William Beaumont Army Medical Center.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 11644089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
