135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644183)
1. Biological monitoring and genetic screening in the industrial workplace: a synopsis and analysis.
Field RI
Law Med Health Care; 1983 Jun; 11(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 11644183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic testing in the workplace.
Rowinski L
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():375-413. PubMed ID: 11645613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Access to employee exposure and medical records; final rule.
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Fed Regist; 1988 Sep; 53(189):38140-68. PubMed ID: 11645643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological monitoring: the employer's dilemma.
Miller FH
Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):388-426. PubMed ID: 11644166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal protection policies in the workplace: continuing controversy in light of Johnson Controls.
Blank R
Politics Life Sci; 1992 Aug; 11(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 11659520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. AIDS in the workplace: public and corporate policy.
Heacock MV; Orvis GP
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(2):689-713. PubMed ID: 11656268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
Andrade VM
Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Joint advisory notice; Department of Labor/Department of Health and Human Services; HBV/HIV.
U.S. Department of Labor. Office of the Secretary
Fed Regist; 1987 Oct; 52(210):41818-24. PubMed ID: 11655853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal aspects of genetics, work and insurance in North America and Europe.
Rothstein MA; Knoppers BM
Eur J Health Law; 1996 Jun; 3(2):143-61. PubMed ID: 11654763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. OSHA regulation of industrial applications of recombinant DNA technology.
Korwek EL
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1981; 50(2):284-313. PubMed ID: 11649489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Executive Order 13145 of February 8, 2000: to prohibit discrimination in federal employment based on genetic information.
Clinton WJ
Fed Regist; 2000 Feb; 65(28):6877-80. PubMed ID: 11660672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. OSHRC rules sterilization is not an occupational hazard.
Jameson R
Trial; 1981 Jul; 17(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11653563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
Buss E
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Making healthy babies.
Henifin MS; Bertin J
Sci People; 1984; 16(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11649543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic discrimination in the workplace: an overview of existing protections.
Kaufmann MB
Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1999; 30(3):393-438. PubMed ID: 11658078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Increasing worker and community awareness of toxic hazards in the workplace.
American Public Health Association
Am J Public Health; 1985 Mar; 75(3):305-8. PubMed ID: 11643733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. OSHA records and privacy: competing interests in the workplace.
Maguire SP
Am Univ Law Rev; 1978; 27(4):953-80. PubMed ID: 11661857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic privacy, discrimination, and social policy: challenges and dilemmas.
Yesley MS
Microb Comp Genomics; 1997; 2(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 11660464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Recombinant DNA and the law: review of some general legal considerations.
Korwek EL
Gene; 1981; 15():1-5. PubMed ID: 11658461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
Barnard D
Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
