BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644188)

  • 1. Beginning of life: discussion.
    Gribetz D
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11644188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending the boundaries of life: implications for practice.
    Abramson M; Black RB
    Health Soc Work; 1985; 10(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 11658746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic medicine in the perspective of Orthodox halakhah.
    Green RM
    Judaism; 1985; 34(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 11655822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
    Rhoden NK
    Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On letting some babies die.
    Smith DH
    Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A matter of life and death: Reform Judaism and the defective child.
    Block RA
    J Reform Jud; 1984; 41(4):14-30. PubMed ID: 11651763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion: where we stand -- a statement on the permissibility of abortion.
    Dorff E; Hauptman J;
    United Synag Rev; 1990; 42(2):16-8. PubMed ID: 11655963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The decline of personhood.
    Wauck J
    Hum Life Rev; 1988; 14(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 11655918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion and infanticide: is there a difference?
    Cannon D
    Policy Rev; 1985; No. 32():12-7. PubMed ID: 11655683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
    Longino PH
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The legacy of Infant Doe.
    Cosby MG
    Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: our moral obligation.
    Otten M
    Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 11657340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moral dilemmas that are acute within a religious tradition: a Jewish perspective; a Catholic perspective.
    Franck I; McCormick RA
    Hosp Pract; 1983 Jul; 18(7):192, 194, 196-198. PubMed ID: 11658451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Life-saving and life-taking: a comment.
    McCormick RA
    Linacre Q; 1975 May; 42(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 11661171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On matters of life and death.
    McCormick RA
    US Cathol; 1982 Mar; 47(3):25-31. PubMed ID: 11655526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Issues in health care meriting particular Christian concern--a priority issue: the severely defective newborn.
    Roy DJ
    Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):60-80. PubMed ID: 11650521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortions and infanticide: America's movement away from human rights.
    Andrusko D
    Lincoln Rev; 1985; 5(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 11655734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Engineering perfect offspring: devaluing children and childhood.
    Fitzgerald WA
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):833-61. PubMed ID: 11657285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.