These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644260)
1. Informed consent does not demand full disclosure of risks. Brahams D Lancet; 1983 Jul; 2(8340):58. PubMed ID: 11644260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hills v. Potter. Great Britain. England. Queen's Bench Division All Engl Law Rep; 1983 May; [1983] 3():716-29. PubMed ID: 11648156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal. Brahams D Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8376):578-9. PubMed ID: 11644281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital. Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Feb; [1984] 1():1018-36. PubMed ID: 11648155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure. Chalmers D; Schwartz R Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Doctor's duty to inform patient of substantial or special risks when offering treatment. Brahams D Lancet; 1985 Mar; 1(8427):528-30. PubMed ID: 2857897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent: recent changes in the law. Boyarsky S J Urol; 1976 Aug; 116(2):226-7. PubMed ID: 950711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doctor's duty to inform patient of risk. Times (Lond); 1984 Feb; ():24. PubMed ID: 11647764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Consent to treatment--how informed is informed consent? Brahams D Med Leg J; 1984; 52(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 11658727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance? Teff H Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Halley v. Birbiglia. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Dec; 390():540-50. PubMed ID: 12041108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective. Brahams D Lancet; 1987 Oct; 2(8566):1038. PubMed ID: 2889956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extent of surgeon's duty to explain particular risks inherent in operation. Brahams D Lancet; 1982 Apr; 1(8275):808-9. PubMed ID: 11644230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks. Wells WT Lancet; 1984 Apr; 1(8383):974. PubMed ID: 6143915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consent to treatment: the medical standard reaffirmed. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Mar; 288(6419):802-3. PubMed ID: 6423089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it). Annas GJ Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Largey v. Rothman. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1988 May; 540():504-11. PubMed ID: 11648568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cowman v. Hornaday. Iowa. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1983 Jan; 329():422-7. PubMed ID: 12041128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]