These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644278)
41. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada? Carnerie F McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Death, dying and the law: a prosecutorial view of the Quinlan case. Collester DG Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):304-28. PubMed ID: 11661463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute. Lieberson A Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. In re L.H.R. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 11644498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Decisionmaking for the incompetent terminally ill patient: a compromise in a solution eliminates a compromise of patients' rights. Knezevich CA Indiana Law J; 1982; 57(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 11649706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The values history: a new standard of care. Rich BA Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy. Stell LK St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology. Richardson E Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Elizabeth Bouvia: who should prevail? Lynn J; Manning MM; Green LM; Kantor JE; Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):49-50. PubMed ID: 11643775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Tony Bland awaits final hearing. Dyer C BMJ; 1993 Jan; 306(6869):11-2. PubMed ID: 11643093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Quinlan, privacy, and the handling of incompetent dying patients. Cantor NL Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):243-266. PubMed ID: 11661461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death. Kutner L Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. Buchanan AE UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]