These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644281)
1. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal. Brahams D Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8376):578-9. PubMed ID: 11644281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital. Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Feb; [1984] 1():1018-36. PubMed ID: 11648155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Doctor's duty to answer patients' inquiries. Brahams D Lancet; 1987 Apr; 1(8538):932. PubMed ID: 11653070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it). Annas GJ Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure. Chalmers D; Schwartz R Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hills v. Potter. Great Britain. England. Queen's Bench Division All Engl Law Rep; 1983 May; [1983] 3():716-29. PubMed ID: 11648156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reibl v. Hughes. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1980 Oct; 114():1-35. PubMed ID: 12041068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consent to treatment--how informed is informed consent? Brahams D Med Leg J; 1984; 52(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 11658727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance? Teff H Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The meaning of informed consent. Whitfield A Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What should a doctor tell? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Aug; 289(6440):325-6. PubMed ID: 6430460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks. Wells WT Lancet; 1984 Apr; 1(8383):974. PubMed ID: 6143915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective. Brahams D Lancet; 1987 Oct; 2(8566):1038. PubMed ID: 2889956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hopp v. Lepp. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1980 May; 112():67-83. PubMed ID: 12041085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consent to treatment: the medical standard reaffirmed. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Mar; 288(6419):802-3. PubMed ID: 6423089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Family accuses doctors of failing to warn of risk. Dyer C BMJ; 1997 Apr; 314(7089):1224. PubMed ID: 11644924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical decision-making: patient participation. Wolfgarten A; Khan A Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California. Churchward AB Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]