These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644306)
1. Biological defense defended. Norman C Science; 1988 May; 240(4855):981. PubMed ID: 11644306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research on biological warfare is challenged. Cushman JH N Y Times Web; 1986 Sep; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. You shall be as gods. Powledge TM Worldview; 1977 Sep; 20(9):45-7. PubMed ID: 11661489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court hears suit on biowarfare laboratory. Smith RJ Science; 1985 May; 228(4701):827-8. PubMed ID: 11643758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. US biological weapons: new test facility defended. Palca J Nature; 1986 Jun; 321(6073):805. PubMed ID: 11645772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. US biological weapons: protests over US Army lab. Clarke M Nature; 1985 Oct; 317(6036):377. PubMed ID: 11653654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; establishment of the Biotechnology Science Coordinating Committee; notice. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy Fed Regist; 1985 Nov; 50(220):47174-95. PubMed ID: 11655733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biological weapons--banned, but gone forever? Humphrey JH Med War; 1987; 3(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 3470592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recombinant DNA research; actions under guidelines; notice. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1984 Sep; 49(179):36052-60. PubMed ID: 11655750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Rifkin vs. Defense Department. Sci News; 1984 Dec 22-29; 126(25-26):397. PubMed ID: 11653595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hazardous biological activities in outer space. McGarrigle P Akron Law Rev; 1984; 18(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 11658579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular politics in a global economy. Wright S Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):249-63. PubMed ID: 11654797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Molecular biology or molecular politics? The production of scientific consensus on the hazards of recombinant DNA technology. Wright S Soc Stud Sci; 1986 Nov; 16(4):593-620. PubMed ID: 11650809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Administration divided over OECD biotech plan. Sun M Science; 1985 Aug; 229(4716):842-3. PubMed ID: 11643793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; announcement of policy; notice for public comment. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy Fed Regist; 1986 Jun; 51(123):23302-50. PubMed ID: 11655807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after. Barkstrom JE Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Recombinant DNA research; proposed actions under guidelines; notice. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1987 Aug; 52(154):29800-14. PubMed ID: 11655869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]