BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644341)

  • 1. Workman's Circle Home and Infirmary for the Aged v. Fink.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(3):407-8. PubMed ID: 11644341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
    Eisenberg KG
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In re Strauss.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(3):405-6. PubMed ID: 11644340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
    Beatty JA
    Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
    Gottlich V
    Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):491-4. PubMed ID: 11644074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
    New Jersey
    N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foregoing nutrition and hydration.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11652511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
    Richardson E
    Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evanescence of living wills.
    Francis LP
    Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late?
    Chapman MA
    Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
    Marzen TJ
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
    Mayo TW
    MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
    Tarantino LM
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Helping the hopelessly ill.
    Landsman RM
    Trusts Estates; 1988 Apr; 127(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11652539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
    Kenney SC
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Right to die takes a twist.
    Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):7. PubMed ID: 11645546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.