These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644367)

  • 1. Opposition to new Title X family planning regulations and affirmation of support for informed consent.
    American Public Health Association
    Am J Public Health; 1989 Mar; 79(3):353-4. PubMed ID: 11644367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Title X family planning subsidies: the government's role in moral issues.
    Reitler EG
    Harvard J Legis; 1990; 27(2):453-95. PubMed ID: 11656070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion -- impact on public health.
    Malkasian GD
    State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 11655953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers.
    Bloche MG
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Groups challenging abortion rules.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. U.S. issues limits on abortion aid by family clinics.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Aug; ():1, 26. PubMed ID: 11647377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reagan bars mention of abortion at clinics receiving U.S. money.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan; ():1, 50. PubMed ID: 11647381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Title X family planning gag rule: can the government buy up constitutional rights?
    Chervin CI
    Stanford Law Rev; 1989 Jan; 41(2):401-34. PubMed ID: 11655926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and marketing of new means of fertility control.
    American Public Health Association
    Am J Public Health; 1989 Mar; 79(3):352-3. PubMed ID: 11644366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. U.S. suspends plan to cut off funds for abortion ties.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Mar; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rust v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 May; 111():1759-89. PubMed ID: 12041295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Latest administration tactic makes abortion fight a free speech issue.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():E7. PubMed ID: 11647385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Govt. tells birth control clinics: notify teens' parents.
    Wood AP
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Feb 15-28; 18(4):1, 22-23. PubMed ID: 11653469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
    Berg P
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond.
    Best M
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public policy on human reproduction and the historian.
    Reed J
    J Soc Hist; 1985; 18(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 11650754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Official tells of U.S. plan to discourage abortions.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Family-planning clinics face dilemma over their mission.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five justices uphold U.S. rule curbing abortion advice Some clinics to still advise but forgo aid.
    Greenhouse L; Brozan N
    N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11647436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.