BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644377)

  • 1. In re Drabick.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In re Bayer.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
    Pollard CT
    Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In re Zahn.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):485. PubMed ID: 11644072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
    Beatty JA
    Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
    Strasser M
    KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
    Oxman ML
    J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In re Bayer.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In re Drabick.
    California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District
    Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
    Kenney SC
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Therefore, choose death.
    Brown ML
    Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
    Eisenberg KG
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
    Mayo TW
    MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Nancy Cruzan case.
    McCormick RA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.