211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644389)
21. Advance directives after Cruzan: are more too many?
Howe EG
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):299-330. PubMed ID: 11651212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Life, death, and incompetent patients: conceptual infirmities and hidden values in the law.
Dresser R
Ariz Law Rev; 1986; 28(3):373-405. PubMed ID: 11652552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The real ethic of death and dying.
Cantor NL
Mich Law Rev; 1996 May; 94(6):1718-38. PubMed ID: 11656929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. "Two steps forward, one step back": an analysis of New Jersey's latest "right-to-die" decisions.
Moore NJ
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):955-98. PubMed ID: 11650182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Forgoing medical treatment: to withdraw, withhold, deny.
Cotler M
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11651354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Zaremba JF
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The values history: a new standard of care.
Rich BA
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Surrogate consent.
Richards N
Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Using advance directives in the home-care setting.
Markson L; Steel K
Generations; 1990; 14(Suppl. 1990):25-8. PubMed ID: 11651068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. 'Euthanasia' and dying well enough.
Ramsey P
Linacre Q; 1977 Feb; 44(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society?
Rothenberg KH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):575-602. PubMed ID: 11650402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity: New Jersey's new legislation.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):335-403. PubMed ID: 11651452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The case of a demented elderly patient (Mr. H) whose family requests the withdrawal of nutrition/hydration: responses.
HEC Forum; 1989; 1(6):359-67. PubMed ID: 11645630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
Vitiello M
LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
