497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644396)
1. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
Blaustein AP
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
Binion G
Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one.
Estrich SR; Sullivan KM
Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Constitution and abortion.
Campbell A
Mod Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 53(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11656038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion and the right of privacy.
Ortega ML
Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
Linton PB
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The constitutional morality of abortion.
Brownstein A; Dau P
Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
Coleman JJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
Simmons PD
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion: round 1.
Dworkin R; Kay J; Schnaubelt CM; Orlans H; Rabinowitz S; Bienenstock AH; Bork ME; Lewy G; Hyde HJ; Singer SF; Gellman M; Ewy CR; Gow HB; Jenks BP; Olson E; Wile F; Cohn RG; Oakes ET; Elshtain JB; Wilson JQ
Commentary; 1994 Mar; 97(3):2-19. PubMed ID: 11659743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
Copelon R
Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Taking rights seriously in the abortion case.
Dworkin R
Ratio Juris; 1990 Mar; 3(1):68-80. PubMed ID: 11656052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
Appleton SF
Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
Rush SE
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights in America.
Bullock JR
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
