These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644396)

  • 41. Logic, law and abortion.
    Degnan M; Pannier R
    Linacre Q; 1992 Feb; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11652613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker.
    Burns SE
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
    Tribe LH
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
    Lockhart T
    Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Crain CA
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
    Kindregan CP
    Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Who is victim?
    Hughes G
    Dalhous Law J; 1974 Oct; 1(3):425-40. PubMed ID: 11660895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
    Parness JA
    West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law.
    McCourt KM; Love DJ
    Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law.
    Cica N
    Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D.
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Apr; 662():407-30. PubMed ID: 11648378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The right to abortion: expansion of the right to privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Goldenberg D
    Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):36-57. PubMed ID: 11663414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
    Patton DE
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J
    Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada.
    McConnell ML
    Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1989 Jul; 109():3040-85. PubMed ID: 12041289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.