These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644396)

  • 61. Roe v. Wade. 22 Jan 1973.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1973; 410():113-78. PubMed ID: 12038376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A divisive issue and a divided court: Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Campbell A
    Oxf J Leg Stud; 1993; 13(4):571-83. PubMed ID: 11656374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life.
    Parness JA; Pritchard SK
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause.
    Looper-Friedman SE
    New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 655():1300-22. PubMed ID: 11648372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The fetus under Section 1983: still struggling for recognition.
    Czepiga PT
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1983; 34(4):1029-65. PubMed ID: 11655745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
    Erca A
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The politics of abortion.
    Gearty C
    J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response.
    Scotland AG
    Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Floyd v. Anders. 4 Nov 1977.
    U.S. District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
    Fed Suppl; 1977; 440():535-40. PubMed ID: 11646007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The contemporary American abortion controversy: stages in the argument.
    Railsback CC
    Q J Speech; 1984 Nov; 70(4):410-24. PubMed ID: 11655797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
    Allen AL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Introduction: did the amici effort make a difference?
    Kolbert K
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):153-68. PubMed ID: 2603857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
    Crepps J; Miller A
    Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The woman's right of privacy.
    Weddington S
    Perkins J; 1973; 27(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 11660987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.