BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644397)

  • 1. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
    Blaustein AP
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Crain CA
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
    Chemerinsky E
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Introduction: did the amici effort make a difference?
    Kolbert K
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):153-68. PubMed ID: 2603857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of abortion.
    McDaniel A
    Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
    Rubenfeld J
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Constitution and abortion.
    Campbell A
    Mod Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 53(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11656038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster.
    Bannon AE; Nigro SA
    State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion: are medicine and the law on a collision course?
    Pollner F
    Med World News; 1985 Jul; 26(13):66-68, 70, 73+. PubMed ID: 11645557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
    Crepps J; Miller A
    Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision.
    Lindholm LM
    Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.