These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644409)

  • 21. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abortion is affirmed, but in a lower voice.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():E1. PubMed ID: 11647366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. After Roe v. Wade: 10 years' conflict over abortion.
    Peterson B; Barbash F; Russell C
    Washington Post; 1983 Jan; ():A1, A12-13. PubMed ID: 11647346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Crain CA
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
    Blaustein AP
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
    Kindregan CP
    Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abortions.
    Maryland
    Michies Annot Code Public Gen Laws Md Md; 1991 Jul; Sects. 20.201 to 20.211 20.214():. PubMed ID: 12043607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Will Roe v. Wade survive the Rehnquist Court?
    Johnsen D; Wilder M
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):457-69. PubMed ID: 11650350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
    Copelon R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Abortion rights in America.
    Bullock JR
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster.
    Bannon AE; Nigro SA
    State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High Court has several options for new look at abortion right.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11647437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Justice Holmes and Roe v. Wade.
    Novick SM
    Trial; 1989 Dec; 25(12):58-64. PubMed ID: 11656018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1989 Jul; 109():3040-85. PubMed ID: 12041289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Abortion still a constitutional issue.
    Lancet; 1983 Apr; 1(8329):866-7. PubMed ID: 11644255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Supreme Court reaffirms 1973 abortion decision.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11646282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.