These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644425)

  • 1. On the winds of fortune.
    Warden J
    BMJ; 1989 Dec; 299(6714):1485. PubMed ID: 11644425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The embryo bill.
    Cameron NM
    Ethics Med; 1989; 5(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 11650335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embryos in the news.
    Mulkay M
    Public Underst Sci; 1994; 3():33-51. PubMed ID: 11659866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Embryo research and fertilisation code.
    Walker A
    BMJ; 1991 Mar; 302(6779):746. PubMed ID: 11642876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parliament gives overwhelming approval to embryo research.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1990 Apr; 126(1714):29. PubMed ID: 11655969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. UK embryo research: government stops Powell bill.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Apr; 314(6012):573. PubMed ID: 11658568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues.
    Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D
    J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Embryo research: British debate under way.
    Nature; 1989 Nov; 342(6249):463. PubMed ID: 11644395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changing minds about embryo research.
    Mulkay M
    Public Underst Sci; 1994; 3():195-213. PubMed ID: 11659865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Embryonic research.
    New Sci; 1984 Sep; 103(1423):2. PubMed ID: 11658549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women in the parliamentary debate over embryo research.
    Mulkay M
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1994; 19(1):5-22. PubMed ID: 11654087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1986 Dec; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Embryonic arguments.
    New Sci; 1985 Feb; 105(1443):2. PubMed ID: 11655664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mr. Enoch Powell's bill.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1985 May; 1(8438):1170. PubMed ID: 11644484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The week in Plymouth:
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6487):72-3. PubMed ID: 11652446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lords worry over Warnock.
    Russell W
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
    Great Britain
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New techniques in the field of human fertilization and embryology.
    Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly
    Hum Reprod; 1986 Jun; 1(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 11643963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lords' vote saves supply of research embryos.
    New Sci; 1990 Mar; 25(1708):22. PubMed ID: 11655968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.