These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644445)

  • 21. Parliament gives overwhelming approval to embryo research.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1990 Apr; 126(1714):29. PubMed ID: 11655969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MPs vote to ban embryo research.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Feb; 105(1444):3. PubMed ID: 11655660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Voluntary authority set up.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Apr 4-10; 314(6010):397. PubMed ID: 3982508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
    Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lords worry over Warnock.
    Russell W
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Warnock report.
    Warnock M
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6489):187-90. PubMed ID: 3926117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Embryo research. Chances of legislation fade.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Nov 21-27; 318(6043):197. PubMed ID: 4069194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Warnock versus Powell (and Harradine): when does potentiality count?
    Lockwood M
    Bioethics; 1988 Jul; 2(3):187-213. PubMed ID: 11659014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Time to break down taboos about infertility.
    Templeton AA
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):39. PubMed ID: 11658552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lords oppose embryo research.
    New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1429):6. PubMed ID: 11655672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The embryo bill.
    Cameron NM
    Ethics Med; 1989; 5(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 11650335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1986 Dec; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lords' vote saves supply of research embryos.
    New Sci; 1990 Mar; 25(1708):22. PubMed ID: 11655968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The week in Plymouth:
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6487):72-3. PubMed ID: 11652446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Embryo research and fertilisation code.
    Walker A
    BMJ; 1991 Mar; 302(6779):746. PubMed ID: 11642876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Embryos untouched.
    Nature; 1985 Feb 21-27; 313(6004):612. PubMed ID: 3974693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New insights into early embryos.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1987 Jul; 115(1568):22-3. PubMed ID: 11655833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. U.S. rules hurt fertilization research.
    Krieger L
    Am Med News; 1984 Oct; 27(37):14. PubMed ID: 11658529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Government looks for guidance through Warnock minefield.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1984 Nov; 2(8411):1107-8. PubMed ID: 11644294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.