These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644465)

  • 1. Order in the Piazzi case.
    Georgia. Superior Court, Richmond County
    Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):415-8. PubMed ID: 11644465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ruling by a court keeps fetus alive.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jul; ():7. PubMed ID: 11647823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In re L.H.R.
    Georgia. Supreme Court
    South East Report Second Ser; 1984 Oct; 321():716-23. PubMed ID: 12041318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posthumous reproduction.
    Robertson JA
    Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(4):1027-65. PubMed ID: 11653158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
    Mulholland KA
    Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constitutional law--husband, as guardian of comatose wife, has standing to assert her constitutional right to refuse medical care... Severns v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., 421 A.2d 1334 (Del. 1980).
    Keane ME
    J Fam Law; 1980-1981; 19(4):769-73. PubMed ID: 11655623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
    Burch TJ
    MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma.
    Peterson GW
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In re A.C.
    District of Columbia. Court of Appeals, en banc
    Atl Report; 1990 Apr; 573():1235-64. PubMed ID: 11648191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In re Jane Doe.
    Georgia. Supreme Court
    South East Report Second Ser; 1992 Jul; 418():3-8. PubMed ID: 12041319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atlanta court bars efforts to end life support for stricken girl, 13.
    Smothers R
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
    MacAvoy-Snitzer J
    Columbia Law Rev; 1987 Oct; 87(6):1280-300. PubMed ID: 11652510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In re Klein.
    New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division
    Wests N Y Suppl; 1989; 538():274-6. PubMed ID: 17083189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Living will statutes: the first decade.
    Gelfand G
    Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In re Guardianship of McInnis.
    Ohio. Probate Court, Stark County
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Nov; 584():1389-90. PubMed ID: 12041222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
    Chrisman JP
    Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Barber v. Superior Court of State of California; Nejdl v. Superior Court of State of California.
    California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2
    Wests Calif Report; 1983 Oct; 195():484-94. PubMed ID: 11648259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In the Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia.
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 1563941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In re Conroy.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County
    Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
    Crook RR
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.