These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644470)

  • 1. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In re Drabick.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In re Bayer.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
    Pollard CT
    Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In re Estate of Prange.
    Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fourth Division
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Feb; 520():946-54. PubMed ID: 12041256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In re Zahn.
    Kirkpatrick GA
    Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):485. PubMed ID: 11644072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
    Mayo TW
    MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In re Bayer.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
    Strasser M
    KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
    Gottlich V
    Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
    Beatty JA
    Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
    Eisenberg KG
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Living will" legislation in Illinois: what it could mean to doctor and patient.
    King PD
    Ill Bar J; 1984 Apr; 72(8):408-410, 412-413. PubMed ID: 11649772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Top Maine court backs right to die.
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():41. PubMed ID: 11646647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan.
    Hoffmann DE
    Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
    Bopp J; Avila D
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In re Gardner.
    Thompson LC
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 11644474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.