These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644472)

  • 1. Johnson v. Sullivan.
    Nimz MM
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 11644472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suit filed in Oklahoma alleging twenty-four infants died after being denied beneficial medical treatment.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 11651816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
    Smith SR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection.
    Crossley MA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn.
    Portela C
    Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
    Conley JJ
    America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Johnson v. Thompson.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Aug; 971():1487-99. PubMed ID: 11648605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early management and decision-making for the treatment of myelomeningocele at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center: observations clinical and ethical.
    Allsopp ME
    Linacre Q; 1986 Feb; 53(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 11650727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
    Longino PH
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wrongdoing denied in care of 24 handicapped babies.
    Hall HB
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11646426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hospital allegedly let some newborns die.
    Kamen A
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1985 developments.
    National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):257-78. PubMed ID: 11651813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
    Kuzma AL
    Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities.
    National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
    Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Destructuring disability: rationing of health care and unfair discrimination against the sick.
    Orentlicher D
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1996; 31(1):49-87. PubMed ID: 11660333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When physicians balk at futile care: implications of the disability rights laws.
    Peters PG
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1997; 91(3):798-864. PubMed ID: 11660527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.