These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644472)
21. Rationing expensive lifesaving medical treatments. Mehlman MJ Wis L Rev; 1985; 1985(2):239-303. PubMed ID: 11658831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it? Clark FI Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma? Shapiro RS; Barthel R Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities. Barry RL Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Due process in the allocation of scarce lifesaving medical resources. Higginbothan L Yale Law J; 1974-1975; 84():1734-48. PubMed ID: 11659584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts. Rhoden NK South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Joining in life and death: on separating the Lakeberg twins. Dougherty CJ Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11653280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. More than a matter of parent's versus children's rights: response to Crutchfield. Zimmerman SL Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 11651711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth. Field MA Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Life-and-death lottery in the nursery. Hentoff N Washington Post; 1984 Apr; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11647767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Medical authority and infanticide. Malone PA J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1(1):77-111. PubMed ID: 11658876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Little murders. Patrick JG New Times; 1978 Apr; 10(7):32-7. PubMed ID: 11658277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K. Watson SB Clin Ethics Rep; 1994; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11652775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding. Born MA KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Intensive care of extremely premature newborns. Joseph R Singapore J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 20(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 11659322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Health care rationing and disability rights. Peters PG Indiana Law J; 1995; 70(2):491-547. PubMed ID: 11660218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe. Drinan RF America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Setting limits: a realistic assignment for the Medicare program? Kinney ED St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):631-70. PubMed ID: 11650405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]