166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644477)
1. United States--life support: one firm decision.
Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8421):157. PubMed ID: 11644477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
Crook RR
Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bartling v. Superior Court.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 5
Wests Calif Report; 1984 Dec; 209():220-7. PubMed ID: 11648164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life-and-death decisions.
Washington Post; 1985 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma.
Peterson GW
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Barber v. Superior Court of State of California; Nejdl v. Superior Court of State of California.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2
Wests Calif Report; 1983 Oct; 195():484-94. PubMed ID: 11648259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The due process of dying.
Flick MR
Calif Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 79(4):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11659478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Jarrett C
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Lords focus on medical ethics.
Warden J
BMJ; 1993 Feb; 306(6877):540-1. PubMed ID: 11643105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada?
Carnerie F
McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Living will statutes: the first decade.
Gelfand G
Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
Koop CE; Grant ER
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In right-to-die fight, court finds family liable for care.
Belkin L
N Y Times Web; 1992 Sep; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11646935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What contributions have social science and the law made to the development of policy on bioethics?
Capron AM
Daedalus; 1999; 128(4):295-325. PubMed ID: 11645880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
