166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644477)
21. Bartling v. Glendale Adventist Medical Center.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 5
Wests Calif Report; 1986 Aug; 229():360-7. PubMed ID: 11648171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.
Miller DH
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die.
Ellman IM
Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. HIV disease: criminal and civil liability for assisted suicide.
McCoy AG
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1991; 21(1):437-85. PubMed ID: 11659852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Law Lords rule that Tony Bland does not create precedent.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1993 Feb; 306(6875):413-4. PubMed ID: 11643102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment.
Malloy SE
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
United States Catholic Conference
Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment.
Bolsen B
Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment.
Dooling RP
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Tony Bland awaits final hearing.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1993 Jan; 306(6869):11-2. PubMed ID: 11643093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
Molenda FA
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. State natural death acts: illusory protection of individuals' life-sustaining treatment decisions.
Lerner MJ
Harvard J Legis; 1992; 29(1):175-221. PubMed ID: 11652635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Life and death decisions: who makes them and by what standards?
Pollock SG
Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):505-40. PubMed ID: 11649262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. "Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment": a critique.
Williams JR
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1984 Nov; 17(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 11651758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
Kenney SC
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
