These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644510)

  • 1. Colleges say no to forced caesarean sections.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6923):224. PubMed ID: 11644510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New medical technology: a chance to reexamine court-ordered medical procedures during pregnancy.
    Ouellette A
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):927-60. PubMed ID: 11652868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women.
    Levy JK
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 11657465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two patients or one? Problems of consent in obstetrics.
    Miller L
    Med Law Int; 1993; 1(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 11659741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
    Scott C
    Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis.
    Grant I
    Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Planning on a miracle: the case of mother versus fetus.
    Paris JJ
    Christ Century; 1994 Mar; 111(8):244-5. PubMed ID: 11659999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
    Stanyer BT
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Courts acting to force care of the unborn.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 May; 1(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
    Daniels JA
    Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal-fetal ethical dilemmas: a guideline for physicians.
    Miller FH
    Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11651353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting.
    Sturgess RH
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court-ordered caesarian sections: in whose interests?
    Stern K
    Mod Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 56(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 11652316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Furthering the inquiry: race, class, and culture in the forced medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Ikemoto LC
    Tenn Law Rev; 1992; 59(3):487-517. PubMed ID: 11652636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.