136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644525)
1. Two American hospitals in dilemma over brain death.
Charatan FB
BMJ; 1994 Mar; 308(6929):618. PubMed ID: 11644525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Court order to treat baby with partial brain prompts debate on costs and ethics.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1994 Feb; ():20. PubMed ID: 11647018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary: what is really at stake in Baby K? A response to Ellen Flannery.
Clayton EW
J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 11644715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital appeals decision ordering treatment for baby missing a brain.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1993 Sep; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11646990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Baby K's mother gives her the prayer that many deny she has.
Tousignant M; Miller B
Washington Post; 1994 Oct; ():A1, A8-9. PubMed ID: 11647052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Anencephalic baby's right to life.
McCarthy M
Lancet; 1993 Oct; 342(8876):919. PubMed ID: 11643245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Death of 'Baby K' leaves a legacy of legal precedents.
Tousignant M; Miller B
Washington Post; 1995 Apr; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11647076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In re Baby K.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Fed Report; 1994 Feb; 16():590-9. PubMed ID: 11648610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Baby K.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division
Fed Suppl; 1993 Jul; 832():1022-31. PubMed ID: 11648613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When a patient demands what health care providers deem foolish: medical-ethical analysis of the case of Baby K.
Peabody JL
Clin Ethics Rep; 1993; 7(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 11653093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Negotiating towards death.
Winkelstein P
Shma; 1996 Feb; 26(508):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hospital fights parents' wish to keep life support for a 'brain dead' child.
N Y Times Web; 1994 Feb; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Brain-dead Florida girl will be sent home on life support.
N Y Times Web; 1994 Feb; ():9. PubMed ID: 11647970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1994; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11652775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical futility: a futile concept?
Shiner K
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1996; 53(2):803-48. PubMed ID: 11656798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital asks the court to decide a brain-dead baby's fate.
Bruni F
N Y Times Web; 1996 Feb; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11647097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. As family protests, hospital seeks an end to woman's life support.
Belkin L
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A1, D22. PubMed ID: 11646800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Taking hostages: the Linares case.
Miles SH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):4. PubMed ID: 11650223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The "right to die" in America: sloganeering from Quinlan and Cruzan to Quill and Kevorkian.
Annas GJ
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 34(4):875-97. PubMed ID: 11657348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
