These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644609)

  • 1. Legislation on prenatal sex-determination in India.
    Kumar S
    Lancet; 1994 Aug; 344(8919):399. PubMed ID: 11644609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. State in India bars fetus-sex testing.
    Weisman SR
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11647852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. India to ban prenatal sex determination.
    Nandan G
    BMJ; 1993 Feb; 306(6874):353. PubMed ID: 11643101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prohibiting amniocentesis in India: a solution to the problem of female infanticide or a problem to the solution of prenatal diagnosis?
    Gorman-Stapleton O
    ILSA J Int Law; 1990; 14():23-43. PubMed ID: 11659426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. India fights abortion of female fetuses.
    Burns JF
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Aug; ():5. PubMed ID: 11647980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benign sex discrimination revisited: constitutional and moral issues in banning sex-selection abortion.
    Schedler G
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1988; 15(3):295-343. PubMed ID: 11659237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of pre-natal diagnostic techniques for sex selection: the Indian scene.
    Kusum
    Bioethics; 1993 Apr; 7(2-3):149-65. PubMed ID: 11651528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Act to provide for the regulation of the use of pre-natal diagnostic techniques for the purpose of detecting genetic or metabolic disorders or chromosomal abnormalities or certain congenital malformations or sex-linked disorders and for the prevention of the misuse of such techniques for the purpose of pre-natal sex determination leading to female foeticide; and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Dated 20 September 1994.
    India
    Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11660855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive prenatal diagnostic technology. Medical, market, or regulatory model?
    Annas GJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1994 Sep; 731():262-8. PubMed ID: 7944132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prenatal diagnosis and female abortion: a case study in medical law and ethics.
    Dickens BM
    J Med Ethics; 1986 Sep; 12(3):143-4, 150. PubMed ID: 3761335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Termination of pregnancy limit: 28, 24, or 18 weeks.
    Hewitt J; Coyle PC; Kelly J
    Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8548):186-7. PubMed ID: 11655907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tough abortion law provokes dismay in Poland.
    Darnton J
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Mar; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The abortion question: Germany's dilemma delays unification.
    Owens TE
    LA Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 53(4):1315-37. PubMed ID: 11656402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex selection abortion: a constitutional analysis of the abortion liberty and a person's right to know.
    Schaibley JR
    Indiana Law J; 1981; 56(2):281-319. PubMed ID: 11658353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism.
    Menon N
    Can J Women Law; 1993; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New reproductive technologies in India: a print media analysis.
    Lingam L
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 11649278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New York state senators introduce bill to uphold surrogate contracts.
    Kolbert E
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Feb; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anti-abortion bill in Idaho takes aim at landmark case.
    Egan T
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Mar; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 11647422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic screening and counseling: the legal and ethical issues.
    Waltz JR; Thigpen CR
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(4):696-768. PubMed ID: 11662927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Italy moves on with in-vitro fertilisation legislation.
    Simini B
    Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1950. PubMed ID: 11660638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.