320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644654)
1. Embryo cloners jumped the gun.
Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5193):1949. PubMed ID: 11644654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. University probe faults 'cloning' research.
Fackelmann KA
Sci News; 1994 Dec; 146(25):406. PubMed ID: 11659894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Let no one split asunder: controversy in human genetic engineering.
Robin SS; Markle GE; Curd M; Duster T; Lappé M; Mazur A
Politics Life Sci; 1987 Aug; 6(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 11650017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Government guinea pigs.
Rothman DJ
N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. If it's research, it must be reviewed: an NIH reprimand.
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics of cloning: who decides?
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1993 Nov; ():Health, 12-13, 15. PubMed ID: 11647945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. U.S. halts research on humans at Duke: university can't ensure safety, probers find.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11647726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. NIH severs ties with researcher who experimented on embryos.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1997 Jan; ():A6-7. PubMed ID: 11648051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospital failed on human research policy.
Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Testimony before the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel.
Irving DN
Linacre Q; 1994 Nov; 61(4):82-9. PubMed ID: 11652834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health.
Wichman A; Mills D; Sandler AL
IRB; 1996; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How well do university researchers police themselves?: a case at Georgetown raises the question.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jan; ():Health Su-13. PubMed ID: 11646786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rules due on disputed embryo research.
Angier N
N Y Times Web; 1994 Sep; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11647977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Institutional review boards and research on individuals with mental disorders.
Hoppe SK
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 11654514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Revising human subjects policy: an example of consensual decision-making.
Cohen JM; Hedberg WB
J Soc Res Adm; 1984; 15(4):29-34. PubMed ID: 11649707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Instituting a research ethic: chilling and cautionary tales.
Pettit P
Bioethics; 1992 Apr; 6(2):90-112. PubMed ID: 11652088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New charges hit Illmensee.
MacKenzie D
New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
