349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644770)
1. Review panel cancels meeting as gene therapy proposals fall.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6567):668. PubMed ID: 11644770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal agency keeps review committee after public comments support continuation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1997 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Gene therapy panel gets a thumbs up.
Science; 1995 Nov; 270(5240):1287. PubMed ID: 11644754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fears mount for gene scrutiny as watchdog faces axe.
Kiernan V
New Sci; 1996 Jun; 150(2033):10. PubMed ID: 11656540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Orkin-Motulsky panel calls for gene therapy basic research.
Fox JL
Gene Ther; 1996 Jan; 3(1):pre-1. PubMed ID: 11644882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.
Wilson DJ
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Panel that reviews gene tests in humans has no applications.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1996 Feb; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gene-splice oversight.
Parens E
Washington Post; 1996 Jun; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11646331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in gene therapy regulation.
Lecomte V; Taylor A
Gene Ther; 1997 Feb; 4(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 11644906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A word to Varmus.
Pryor D; Hatfield M; Wyden R; Waxman HA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 11644858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Plan to end genetics panel troubles EPA.
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5278):1035. PubMed ID: 11644823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
Levine C; Caplan AL
IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The NIH trials of growth hormone for short stature.
Tauer CA
IRB; 1994 May; 16(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 11659923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal report says protection of human subjects is threatened by numerous factors.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 May; 11(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research compliance changes will affect rules on protection of human subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 May; 14(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Gene dream fades away.
Coghlan A
New Sci; 1995 Nov; 148(2005):14-5. PubMed ID: 11656474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Much more research to fall under IRB review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):3. PubMed ID: 11658059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
van Eys J; Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]