These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Privacy and antidiscrimination issues: genetics legislation in the United States. Hodge JG Community Genet; 1998; 1(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 11657306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Trenton votes to put strict limits on use of gene tests by insurers. Preston J N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A1, B6. PubMed ID: 11647271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic discrimination, insurability and legislation: a closing of the legal loopholes. Bornstein RA J Law Policy; 1996; 4(2):551-610. PubMed ID: 11660776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information. Stepanuk NA Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic privacy in Washington state: policy considerations and a Model Genetic Privacy Act. Jensen KA Seattle Univ Law Rev; 1997; 21(2):357-86. PubMed ID: 11660670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic privacy, discrimination, and social policy: challenges and dilemmas. Yesley MS Microb Comp Genomics; 1997; 2(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 11660464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The genetics revolution, economics, ethics, and insurance. Brockett PL; Tankersley ES J Bus Ethics; 1997 Nov; 16(15):1661-76. PubMed ID: 11660475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. States pass laws to regulate uses of genetic testing. Pear R N Y Times Web; 1997 Oct; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11648071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Harnessing the human genome through legislative constraint. Smith GP Eur J Health Law; 1998 Mar; 5(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 11657115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Distinguishing genetic from nongenetic medical tests: some implications for antidiscrimination legislation. Alper JS; Beckwith J Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 11657770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic discrimination in employment and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Rothstein MA Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):23-84. PubMed ID: 11656667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Protecting genetic difference. Yesley MS Berkeley Technol Law J; 1998; 13(2):653-65. PubMed ID: 11979598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ELSI: Cambridge Symposium -- Mark A. Rothstein on "Protecting genetic privacy: why it is so hard to do". Hum Genome News; 1999 Feb; 10(1-2):14-5. PubMed ID: 11657565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Recent legislation on genetics and insurance. Davis HR; Mitrius JV Jurimetrics; 1996; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 11658097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic testing in the workplace: employer dream, employee nightmare -- legislative regulation in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany. Deyerle KA Comp Labor Law J; 1997; 18(4):547-99. PubMed ID: 11657448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal aspects of genetics, work and insurance in North America and Europe. Rothstein MA; Knoppers BM Eur J Health Law; 1996 Jun; 3(2):143-61. PubMed ID: 11654763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bill restricts genetic information use. Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5276):727. PubMed ID: 11644822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Controls on DNA could impact research. Kaiser J Science; 1996 Jul; 273(5273):299. PubMed ID: 11644818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]