446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644818)
1. Controls on DNA could impact research.
Kaiser J
Science; 1996 Jul; 273(5273):299. PubMed ID: 11644818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic prophecy and genetic privacy.
Annas GJ
Trial; 1996 Jan; 32(1):18-20, 22-25. PubMed ID: 11660605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dangerous intersections.
Korn D
Issues Sci Technol; 1996; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11654761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Possible protection for researchers who maintain genetic data records.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Apr; 11(4):6. PubMed ID: 11660233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent legislation on genetics and insurance.
Davis HR; Mitrius JV
Jurimetrics; 1996; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 11658097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is genetics research "minimal risk".
Merz JF
IRB; 1996; 18(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 11654745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The secrets of the genome revealed: threats to genetic privacy.
Doot GM
Wayne Law Rev; 1991; 37(3):1615-45. PubMed ID: 11659542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Social issues of genome innovation and intellectual property.
Draper EA
Risk; 1996; 7(3):201-29. PubMed ID: 11655075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Archive available for genetic studies.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5342):1389. PubMed ID: 11644980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Timing is everything for tissue-sample genetics.
Haglund K
J NIH Res; 1997 Jan; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 11654602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information.
Stepanuk NA
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Position paper on genetic discrimination Position paper on human genome initiative.
Council for Responsible Genetics
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 11650968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA identification testing: assessing the threat to privacy.
Burk DL
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 11656259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of genetic testing in the health insurance industry: the creation of a "biologic underclass".
O'Hara S
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 22(4):1211-28. PubMed ID: 11659756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bill restricts genetic information use.
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5276):727. PubMed ID: 11644822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy?
Yee YH
Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting genetic privacy.
Annas GJ
Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):43-44, 46. PubMed ID: 11654493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Forget Washington: state laws threaten to restrict genetic research, too.
Fox JL
J NIH Res; 1997 Nov; 9(11):19-20. PubMed ID: 11656800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information.
Dash JF
J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 2(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 11658225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic information and property theory.
Barrad CM
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 87(3):1037-86. PubMed ID: 11656395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
