These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11644924)

  • 1. Family accuses doctors of failing to warn of risk.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Apr; 314(7089):1224. PubMed ID: 11644924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consent to treatment--how informed is informed consent?
    Brahams D
    Med Leg J; 1984; 52(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 11658727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure.
    Chalmers D; Schwartz R
    Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance?
    Teff H
    Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8376):578-9. PubMed ID: 11644281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The meaning of informed consent.
    Whitfield A
    Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Feb; [1984] 1():1018-36. PubMed ID: 11648155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Sidaway case.
    Wells WT
    Lancet; 1985 Mar; 1(8430):709. PubMed ID: 11644446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California.
    Churchward AB
    Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Halley v. Birbiglia.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
    Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Dec; 390():540-50. PubMed ID: 12041108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The patient's right to know -- a comparative view.
    Giesen D; Hayes J
    Anglo Am Law Rev; 1992; 21(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 11659667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond Bolam: responding to the patient.
    Feenan DK
    Med Law Int; 1994; 1(2):177-93. PubMed ID: 11653113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doctor's duty to inform patient of risk.
    Times (Lond); 1984 Feb; ():24. PubMed ID: 11647764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fraudulent concealment and the duty to disclose medical mistakes.
    Robertson G
    Alta Law Rev; 1987; 25(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11657367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Malpractice: questions of consent in connection with treatment of genital or urinary organs.
    Frantz LB
    Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1979; 89():32-77. PubMed ID: 12091927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marino v. Ballestas.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 Nov; 749():162-71. PubMed ID: 11648512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doctor's duty to answer patients' inquiries.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1987 Apr; 1(8538):932. PubMed ID: 11653070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hills v. Potter.
    Great Britain. England. Queen's Bench Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1983 May; [1983] 3():716-29. PubMed ID: 11648156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance of invasive procedures by HIV-infected doctors: the duty to disclose under the informed consent doctrine.
    DeBarge MW
    Conn Law Rev; 1993; 25(3):991-1025. PubMed ID: 11659692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatments of last resort: informed consent and the diffusion of new technology.
    King NM; Henderson G
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1007-50. PubMed ID: 11651433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.