These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. New Zealand Bioethics Conference February 2004: emerging biotechnologies: ethics and regulation. Evans D N Z Bioeth J; 2004 Feb; 5(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 15597488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective. Vasil IK Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. EU reflects European public opinion. Borch K; Lassen J; Jørgensen RB Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):976. PubMed ID: 12949553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Patenting animals and other living things. O'Connor KW South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):597-621. PubMed ID: 11645846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Draft report to annual and central conferences, Dec 1990: an invitation to explore a frontier. United Methodist Church. Genetic Science Task Force Engage Soc Action; 1991 Jan; 4(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 11659313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Report urges freedom for genetic engineers. New Sci; 1981 Apr; 90(1247):8. PubMed ID: 11664138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Regulating genetic engineering in an era of increased judicial deference: a proper balance of the federal powers. Von Oehsen WH Adm Law Rev; 1988; 40(3):303-44. PubMed ID: 11650827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Biotechnology: can a new technology survive? Withers WW; Kenworthy PG St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):673-97. PubMed ID: 11650845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. New genetic medicine and public opinion. Howse JL Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1993; 8(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 11652663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Swiss democracy has its advantages. Greely HT Nature; 1998 May; 393(6682):205. PubMed ID: 9607750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Ten reactions to the government inquiry report. A summary. Australas Biotechnol; 1992 Jun; 2(3):152-66. PubMed ID: 1368373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. How not to run a scientifically successful country. Nature; 1998 Apr; 392(6678):741. PubMed ID: 11645055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Biotechnology patenting: the wicked animal must defend itself. Crespi S Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1995 Sep; 17(9):431-41. PubMed ID: 11654979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. GMO opposition not based on a mistake. Cayford J Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):493. PubMed ID: 12721570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Ethical and legal issues in patenting new animal life. Dresser R Jurimetrics; 1988; 28(4):399-435. PubMed ID: 11652544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]