These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645050)
1. Denmark takes a lead on research ethics. Goldbeck-Wood S BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7139):1189. PubMed ID: 11645050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research. Jellinek MS; Levine RJ IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974. U.S US Statut Large; 1974; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical science, the clinical trial and society. Marston RQ Hastings Cent Rep; 1973 Apr; 3(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11660997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. All is not well in research on human subjects. Goldman J N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11647822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National Research Service Awards and Protection of Human Subjects Act. Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Sep; 119(131):S16333-52. PubMed ID: 11663135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research ethics review in Australia, Europe and North America. McNeill PM IRB; 1989; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The noninstitutional review board: a case history. Herman SS IRB; 1984; 6(1):1-3, 12. PubMed ID: 11649540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Protection of human subjects. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Code Fed Regul Public Welfare; 1995 Oct; Title 45(Sections 46-101 to 46-409):. PubMed ID: 11686173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring of drug tests is faulted. Eichenwald K N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects. Owens JF Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human experimentation regulations: too little or too much? FAS Prof Bull; 1975 Feb; 3(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11664436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary. Reiser SJ; Knudson P IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The regulation of biomedical research experimentation in Canada: developing an effective apparatus for the implementation of ethical principles in a scientific milieu. Verdun-Jones S; Weisstub DN Ottawa Law Rev; 1996-1997; 28(2):297-341. PubMed ID: 11657290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Appeal procedures in medical experimentation. Whitmore CW J Leg Med (N Y); 1977 Dec; 5(12):57. PubMed ID: 11643544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]