These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645058)
21. Legal frameworks to prevent harm in-utero. Bewley S Med Law Int; 1994; 1(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 11652958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Medical treatment: the mother's rights. Bridgeman J Family Law; 1993 Sep; 23():534-5. PubMed ID: 11657220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making. Stanyer BT Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question. Levine EM Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies. Sangree S Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Re S (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Oct; [1992]4():671-2. PubMed ID: 11648229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Medical treatment--refusal of medical treatment--adult--refusal on religions grounds: Re S (refusal of medical treatment). Lloyd H; Munby J; Brown SP; New Law J; 1992 Oct; 142(6573):1450-1. PubMed ID: 16184670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Detention and treatment (competent adult): pregnant woman and unborn child -- Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F. Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1999; 7(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 11658029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse? Leavine BA Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans. Rhoden NK Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women. Daniels JA Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color. Krauss DJ Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery? Blickenstaff DC Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 88(3):1157-99. PubMed ID: 11656414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Force feeding and the Mental Health Act 1983. Fennell P New Law J; 1995 Mar; 145(6685):319-20. PubMed ID: 11660283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Can a court order participation in research? Holder AR IRB; 1987; 9(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 11649949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest. Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Albany debates plan to force treatment on the mentally ill. Hernandez R N Y Times Web; 1999 Jul; ():20. PubMed ID: 11648128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Re F (In Utero). Morgan D J Soc Welfare Law; 1988; No. 3():197-202. PubMed ID: 11659077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]