These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645064)
1. Duty to warn; negligence; AIDS/HIV; surgeon: Doe v. Noe. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1998; 22(2):250. PubMed ID: 11645064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Obligations of HIV-infected health professionals to inform patients of their serological status: evolving theories of liability. LeBlang TR John Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 27(2):317-30. PubMed ID: 11654695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The performance of invasive procedures by HIV-infected doctors: the duty to disclose under the informed consent doctrine. DeBarge MW Conn Law Rev; 1993; 25(3):991-1025. PubMed ID: 11659692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Physicians with AIDS: a proposal for efficient disclosure. Hertz J Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(2):749-78. PubMed ID: 11659904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right of an HIV-infected surgeon to practice: the Behringer case. Ginzburg HM Pediatr AIDS HIV Infect; 1991 Dec; 2(6):366-71. PubMed ID: 11659557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Liability for "knowing" transmission of HIV: the evolution of a duty to disclose. Gabel JB Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):981-1029. PubMed ID: 11660260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Doe v. Noe. Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Sixth Division North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Dec; 690():1012-23. PubMed ID: 12041225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reverse informed consent: the unreasonably dangerous patient. Oddi AS Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 46(6):1417-83. PubMed ID: 11659884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who's afraid of whom? Courts require HIV-infected doctors to obtain informed consent of patients. Logan MK De Paul Law Rev; 1995; 44(2):483-511. PubMed ID: 11660217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. HIV testing of health care workers: conflict between the common law and the Centers for Disease Control. Johnson MD Am Univ Law Rev; 1993; 42(2):479-541. PubMed ID: 11659651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Faya v. Almaraz. Maryland. Court of Appeals Atl Report; 1993 Mar; 620():327-39. PubMed ID: 11648611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Illinois court says physician has duty to reveal HIV to patient. AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Feb; 13(2):1, 8-9. PubMed ID: 11365058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AIDS and the law of Virginia. Labowitz KE Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1992; 3(1):67-112. PubMed ID: 11659881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An Indiana doctor's duty to warn non-patients at risk of HIV infection from an AIDS patient. Stroud KM Indiana Law Rev; 1989; 22(2):587-617. PubMed ID: 11650418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians. Bobinski MA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspectives on patient confidentiality in the age of AIDS. Goode JS Syracuse Law Rev; 1993; 44(3):967-1001. PubMed ID: 11660175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Doctors, AIDS, and confidentiality in the 1990s. Taub S John Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 27(2):331-46. PubMed ID: 11654696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Positively truthful: appeal asks whether doctors have duty to disclose HIV status to patients. Baker D ABA J; 1998 Aug; 84():38-40. PubMed ID: 11660521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. AIDS crisis and the health care community: public concerns triggering questionable private rights of action for emotional harms and legislative response. Beane D Mercer Law Rev; 1994; 45(2):633-86. PubMed ID: 11660110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]