344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645074)
1. Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.
Cooper-Mahkorn D
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7148):1850. PubMed ID: 11645074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity?
Jefferson T
Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 11657769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].
Bonnet F; Samama CM
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):816-20. PubMed ID: 22727915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time.
Edsall JT
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 11657783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication.
Friedman PJ
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1416-9. PubMed ID: 2406474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals.
Wang T; Xing QR; Wang H; Chen W
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Jun; 25(3):855-868. PubMed ID: 29516389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
Farthing MJ
Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The process of publication.
Koshland DE
Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cheating in science and publishing.
Altman LK
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Figure errors, sloppy science, and fraud: keeping eyes on your data.
Williams CL; Casadevall A; Jackson S
J Clin Invest; 2019 Mar; 129(5):1805-1807. PubMed ID: 30907748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature.
Pfeifer MP; Snodgrass GL
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1420-3. PubMed ID: 2406475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nazi data on hypothermia termed unscientific.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1990 May; ():B11. PubMed ID: 11646755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retractions of scientific publications: responsibility and accountability.
Katavić V
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 24969915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
Maisonneuve H
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.
Sox HC; Rennie D
Ann Intern Med; 2006 Apr; 144(8):609-13. PubMed ID: 16522625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis and implications of retraction period and coauthorship of fraudulent publications.
Foo JY; Tan XJ
Account Res; 2014; 21(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 24325213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
