These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645114)
1. Hospital failed on human research policy. Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bill of rights for research subjects. Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research. Jellinek MS; Levine RJ IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks. Puglisi JT; Ellis GB Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies. Prentice ED; Gordon B IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects. Wheeler DL Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An even safer safety net. Prentice E Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):46. PubMed ID: 11644996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role? Freedman B IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]