346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645181)
1. Involuntary treatment: civilly committed patients may be involuntarily medicated; involuntary medication to restore competence to stand trial requires judicial approval.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):493-4. PubMed ID: 11645181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
Knepper K
Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Dlugacz HA
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Refusal of medical treatment in "captive" circumstances.
Somerville MA
Can Bar Rev; 1985; 63():59-90. PubMed ID: 11660372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
Gutierrez L
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Drug-induced alteration of psychotic behavior: who benefits?
Schaefer GJ
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):43-68. PubMed ID: 11654455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right of the civilly committed mental patient to refuse treatment.
Wellsch T
Sask Law Rev; 1983-1984; 48(2):269-91. PubMed ID: 11658817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional law--an involuntarily committed mental patient has a qualified right to make treatment decisions absent a formal adjudication of incompetence--Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health.
White AB
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1984; 18(3):503-11. PubMed ID: 11658616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The scope of the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs: an analysis of the least restrictive alternative doctrine.
Dudzik CJ
Villanova Law Rev; 1982 Nov; 28(1):101-48. PubMed ID: 11658466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Court-ordered electro-convulsion therapy for involuntarily committed mental patients: a right of choice?
Taylor-Dunn K
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1987-1988; 23(3):679-701. PubMed ID: 11659065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Paternalism, civil commitment and illness politics: assessing the current debate and outlining a future direction.
Arrigo BA
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):131-68. PubMed ID: 11652819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
Miller RD
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right of mentally ill patients in South Africa to refuse treatment.
Allan A; Allan M
S Afr Law J; 1997; 114(Pt. 4):724-37. PubMed ID: 11660580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views.
Hafemeister TL; Petrila J
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The forcible medication of involuntarily committed mental patients with antipsychotic drugs--Rogers v. Okin.
Robinson RM
Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):739-62. PubMed ID: 11658322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
