These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645181)

  • 1. Involuntary treatment: civilly committed patients may be involuntarily medicated; involuntary medication to restore competence to stand trial requires judicial approval.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):493-4. PubMed ID: 11645181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Refusal of medical treatment in "captive" circumstances.
    Somerville MA
    Can Bar Rev; 1985; 63():59-90. PubMed ID: 11660372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
    Gutierrez L
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
    Roth LH
    Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Drug-induced alteration of psychotic behavior: who benefits?
    Schaefer GJ
    J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):43-68. PubMed ID: 11654455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right of the civilly committed mental patient to refuse treatment.
    Wellsch T
    Sask Law Rev; 1983-1984; 48(2):269-91. PubMed ID: 11658817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cort RS
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--an involuntarily committed mental patient has a qualified right to make treatment decisions absent a formal adjudication of incompetence--Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health.
    White AB
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1984; 18(3):503-11. PubMed ID: 11658616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The scope of the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs: an analysis of the least restrictive alternative doctrine.
    Dudzik CJ
    Villanova Law Rev; 1982 Nov; 28(1):101-48. PubMed ID: 11658466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court-ordered electro-convulsion therapy for involuntarily committed mental patients: a right of choice?
    Taylor-Dunn K
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1987-1988; 23(3):679-701. PubMed ID: 11659065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paternalism, civil commitment and illness politics: assessing the current debate and outlining a future direction.
    Arrigo BA
    J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):131-68. PubMed ID: 11652819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
    Miller RD
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right of mentally ill patients in South Africa to refuse treatment.
    Allan A; Allan M
    S Afr Law J; 1997; 114(Pt. 4):724-37. PubMed ID: 11660580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views.
    Hafemeister TL; Petrila J
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The forcible medication of involuntarily committed mental patients with antipsychotic drugs--Rogers v. Okin.
    Robinson RM
    Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):739-62. PubMed ID: 11658322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.