BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645231)

  • 1. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
    Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fraud case that evaporated.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Star chambers will result in injustice.
    Kevles DJ
    Nature; 1998 Sep; 395(6700):317. PubMed ID: 11645104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific reasoning and due process.
    Guenin LM; Davis BD
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Jan; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11657786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
    Pascal CB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Appeals panel reverses fraud finding.
    Fackelmann K
    Sci News; 1996 Jul; 150(1):4. PubMed ID: 11654356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends.
    Mishkin B
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 11657867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal).
    Chubin DE
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3-year inquiry exonerates breast cancer researcher.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1997 Mar; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
    Choo V
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Office of Scientific Integrity.
    Hamilton DP
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Jun; 2(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11645744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
    Price AR
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempt to define research misconduct.
    Guston DH
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 11657850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. American scientist who found H.I.V. is investigated anew.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A1, B9. PubMed ID: 11646925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
    Hilts P
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.