These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11645293)

  • 1. The status of the foetus under Canadian law.
    Jackman M
    Health Law Can; 1995; 15(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 11645293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sui generis: the legal nature of the foetus in Canada.
    McConnell ML
    Can Bar Rev; 1991; 70():548-56. PubMed ID: 11656180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unborn child in Canadian law.
    Weiler KM; Catton K
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1976 Dec; 14(3):643-59. PubMed ID: 11664746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Borowski case.
    Shumiatcher MC
    Rev Gen Droit; 1989; 20():299-324. PubMed ID: 11656436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The beginnings of personhood: legal considerations.
    Taubenfeld HJ
    Perkins J; 1973; 27(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 11660984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion, personhood, and privacy in Texas.
    Johnson A
    Tex Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 68(7):1521-44. PubMed ID: 11656019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The constitutional validity of abortion legislation: a comparative note.
    Glenn HP
    McGill Law J; 1975; 21(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 11663622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal rights? It depends.
    Doudera AE
    Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):38-44, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11649512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personhood, abortion and the law.
    Verkamp BJ
    America (NY); 1982 Jan; 146(3):46-8. PubMed ID: 11658287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the difference between a "person" and a "human being" within the law?
    McHugh JT
    Rev Polit; 1992; 54(3):445-61. PubMed ID: 11656219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion and the law: equal protection.
    Landau R
    Natl Rev; 1973 Jan; 25(3):87+. PubMed ID: 11663435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Canada's abortion law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
    Martin SL
    Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):339-84. PubMed ID: 11651094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The politics of abortion.
    Gearty C
    J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life.
    Parness JA; Pritchard SK
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Canada got a human death amendment.
    Muggeridge J
    Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):16-23. PubMed ID: 11655597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The status of the human fetus.
    Lang W
    Crim Law Forum; 1992; 3(3):419-40. PubMed ID: 11656397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion law in Canada: a need for reform.
    Campbell T
    Sask Law Rev; 1977; 42():221-50. PubMed ID: 11664124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dehler v. Ottawa Civic Hospital et al. 5 Sep 1979.
    Canada. Supreme Court of Ontario, Toronto Motions Court
    Leg Med Q; 1979; 3(2):141-148, 1979. PubMed ID: 11645420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.